The Mouth that Swallowed Moscow

Michael Lucas can always be counted on to demonstrate why he is known as "Queen Michael" and the "Mouth that Swallowed Moscow" hmm sounds like a 50's Soviet B movie. Of course for someone who lives in NYC so he can gaze upon his two favorite Phallic symbols (the Chrysler building and Empire State) and dream,,,Michaels mouth is not the only thing yawning wide open!

The Rich dark brown wet ones, this aging Prima donna insists on squatting and dropping on GayPorno land are getting tiresome and tedious.

Lucas seems to have an infantile need for self adulation and braggadocio.

Many of my friends know I enjoy some of the videos from Lucas Entertainment, The Intern will be on my top 10 list for 2007.

I love Michael Lucas movies, it's Michael Lucas I Detest!

Lucas is the Howard Cosell of Gay Porn and that is illustrative, we all watched Monday Night Football despite the flatulent noises from Howard because you had good football and great people on that show in spite of Cosell mindless inanity's!

The same rule applys to Lucas Entertainment.

Michael Lucas is the public face of the studio, while the hired help actually Make the company what it is. Tony DiMarco is responsible for Writing and Directing the Videos that are released, EVERYTHING is outsourced, it is well Known that Queen Micheal does not even write his own Blog or press releases. English being a second language and all.

I know you are thinking okay what has the L'enfant terrible of Gay Porn done this time to piss Dewayne off.

Lets go back to Florida shall we,,,

from Brents Blog,,,

Aside from that, I had the pleasure of meeting two other porn stars while being here on set for this project,,,I will say, however, that these two certainly made their antipathy and disinterest for me very clear without mouthing any words at all.

Funny how the legit actors welcomed me with genuine interest and open arms, and this pair basically ignored my presence on this project.

I will say that one,(Michael Lucas) in fact, has taken the liberty of posting written, multi paragraph notices to the industry urging fans, viewers, journalists, studios, and producers not to buy my work, support my cause, or hire me for adult projects. So, I do find it rather interesting that he can work beside me on the same set without harboring those initial feelings,,,

,,,Look, I don’t hate this man. I’ve said it a thousand times; I base my opinions of people on my experiences with them. A tough life, if nothing else, has taught me this. At this time, all I ask is that this man put some of his producer prejudice feelings aside long enough to shake my hand without acting like it hurts to do so.

Let's read Michaels response to Brent (from JustUsBoys)

"Hey Angel,

I read your entry about what Brent Corrigan wrote on his blog. You wrote:

"One is that Michael Lucas would be willing to do ANYTHING with Brent Corrigan."

My explanation for this is very simple. I didn't do anything with Brent at all. This wasn't my production, and I didn't have a scene with him. He was staying in the same resort, and though he's a nice guy, forgiveness is not my virtue when it comes to such serious matters as personal freedoms.

No, my opinion about Brent has not changed. Yes, I did ignore him, as his presence reminded me constantly about how close we producers and studios can get to losing our freedoms.

I obviously am not in a position of dictating to producers of mainstream movies who to hire and who not to; it is their choice. However, my recommendation to the adult industry remains the same. No matter how nice or cute a model is, we should not be hiring those who are playing with our personal freedoms.

I take matters of law very seriously. I do not ever want to go to jail because of some dumb, little, irresponsible boy.

Feel free to contact me if you have any further questions about this.

Michael Lucas
CEO, Lucas Entertainment"

Well Michael you state you refused to work with Brent Corrigan and you continue to seek to ostracize ,belittle and Blacklist Brent Corrigan!

You choose to "stick up" for the Porn Producer Bryan Kocis and his opinion, he was right, it was all Brent Corrigans fault, the same sad song of Blame the 17 yo while exonerating the 39 yo Raping Pervert Porn Producer! I am sure you blame Bryans 15 year old rape/child pornography victim in 2001 as well!

Well now that your allegiance to the true shining lights of YOUR business has been established,
I would assume you feel the wrong person died in January. Your sense of justice and fairplay would only have been served by Brent Corrigan being killed in order to assure that no dumb, little, irresponsible boy should ever dare report a Producers Criminal activity again.

The mendacity of people like you Michael simply amazes me, the filth and human excrement you defend while calling for the personal destruction of someone who exposed a man for the criminal he was. But do you fear the Brent Corrigans of this world because you don't trust yourself, you just might get caught with your pants down with a 17 yo sucking your dick.
Worry that one of your former models might have a nasty word for how YOU treat your talent.

Ask Chad Hunt, or Hunter James about your behavior. Or pornstars Owen Hawk and Mathias Von Fistenberg of Dark Alley Media, they sued you for $750,000 for slander, libel, interference with trade, and other legal complaints in 2006. You settled and PAID! That Mouth again!

Michael your legal comeuppance can't happen soon enough to suit me, you deserve it just like you richly served up that expensive little lawsuit over the Fellini film Copyright,, ah yes YOUR sense of Entitlement made you pursue the legally suspect path of infringing the copyright of a great man and his work! With your artless ,cheap wannabe parody, if it was a parody instead of a ripoff you might have a legal leg to stand on, nice to see most of your profit has been wiped out by your little misadventure. Would be a shame if the Fellini copyright holders really do believe you are worth millions and take you for every dime you don't have!

Well Michael your smug,self satisfied air of contempt would be understandable if that were the end of the story.

But thats not the whole story is it Michael?

Explain Queen Michael why you courted Brent Corrigan last summer to film with Lucas Entertainment?

Explain Queen Michael why days before your La Dolce Vita began production in Sept 2006 you emailed Brent Corrigan asking him to appear in La Dolce Vita.

Explanation Please Michael Lucas.

I have seen the emails from Lucas Entertainment YOU sent to Brent Corrigan including your generous salary offer.

Unfortunately Brent Corrigan turned YOU down as he was working on his own site and could not fly to NYC on a moments notice.

We are forced to conclude Michael that You got your garters in a bunch because the 19 year old Brent Corrigan TURNED YOU DOWN! He refused to drop everything for the exciting once in a lifetime experience of getting hosed by the biggest Prig in the NYC Sewage Dept, oops excuse me, the NY Porn Studio known as Lucas EnterTURDment!

You sir are a Flatulent GasBag and a Petulant little man, a has been porn star from the Last Century, whose artistic pretensions rest solely on the shoulders of people more talented and intelligent than you are!

What a Sad Pathetic little man you are! Why don't you get your Law license Michael then you can defend your crackpot studio from International Media Films.

Hope you are a better Lawyer than you are a Pornographer, sounds like the IMF lawyers have nailed your artistic pretensions. You make Skin Flick's Michael nothing more, guys fucking on camera, save us the AFI wannabe crap! If you had an ounce of real talent you would be in Hollywood churning out REAL SHIT!

Remember this soliloquy from Tony Richardson lawyer for the plaintiff:

"For a long time, since probably the — well, surely the majority of the world’s population has been alive — this name “La Dolce Vita” has meant one movie. Now it is meaning two, and it identifies two distinctly different types of movie, one of which is I guess free speech, but it is still something that’s held as inappropriate by much of the population.

What we have here is what for all practical purposes is a serious art film, a work of art being debased by what appears to be a hard-core pornographic film. It is as simple as that. It is our feeling, it is our belief that this is going to damage the picture. It has damaged La Dolce Vita some now, it will damage it more as time goes on and as more people come to associate Mr. Lucas’s work with the words “La Dolce Vita.”

“I hope we can now get this whole unnecessary distraction behind us. is that the quote celebrating victory, or the trailer notes on the film box?"

comment from the Legal Blog quoting Michael Lucas (he wrongly thought the suit was dismissed the judge simply refused to halt distribution pending trial!)

"It just seems that Mr. Lucas, Esq. is merely making a living using what most other lawyers are accused of being."

Links on Michael Lucas "Legal entanglement"
Law Blog
WikiPedia
Michael Lucas at Wikipedia